Відео

GTX 1080, because Vega 64's/56's have been hardcore mining GPUs since their launch, as they were far better for mining than even the 1080ti for less money

Bro literally does ads for the chinese government.

You are not completely right. AMD have official support for VEGA (gfx9) and polaris (gfx8) down to gcn1 (gfx6) on Linux. You are using the wrong OS for compatibility of old cards. I hope you can try chimeraOS or Bazzite instead of Micro$oft OS.

I don't think I've bought a "new" graphics card in gosh close to 10 years now, the last time was a 980TI and I'm pretty sure that came out in 2015 so yeah damn near 10 years

Just to note, the sticker on that RX 580 shows it to be a 2048SP part, so basically a mildly-overclocked RX 570. It won't make a large difference to the results, but still worth pointing out.

If it wasnt for driver support, NO ONE WOULD BUY NEW GPUs. Prices too high? Too bad. They will force you to upgrade through dropping driver support. This market is long overdue for a total crash. NVIDIA thinks they can trick gamers into buying overpriced crap and trick investors into caring about the future of AI development. DO NOT BUY NEW GPUs.

That first Alan Wake snippet in the intro of the Vega 64 broke me for some reason

It's rather surprising how well have the Pascal cards held up, they just refuse to die…a friend of mine runs an internet cafe and many of the PCs there have GTX 1080s (with reference coolers, similar to the one in the video). I was surprised by its performative on 1440p while playing some Titanfall 2. Sadly we'll never see such a generation of GPUs again.

Gtx 1080ti is still amazing

I personally have 2 vega 64 engineering samples in my rig. My poor i9 7920x can't keep up even with a 5ghz all core oc.

i bought a VEGA 64 like 2 years ago for my 8600K @ 4,6GHz and im more than happy with it, but its time for whole pc upgrade now

Will these cards be good for playing older games? Probably not, so they're useless to a lot of us. Very few PC players only play newer games, and I don't want issues trying to run a game from a decade ago that any Nvidia or AMD card can run flawlessly. That's Intel's problem, they're stuck in the future, giving features that no one cares about yet.

I have an Asrock AB350 Pro and honestly it's a nice motherboard, I'm currently rocking a Ryzen 7 5700X amd 6600XT (I'm looking to replace the GPU at some point)...

so my Ryzen 9 7950x3d is not a gaming cpu?

1080 ....ti 😁

Im a little bit confused guys, is the X870 the high end line of motherboards for this chipset? Are we going to see any new AM5 chipset upgrades on the B650 line?

And FYI a 1080ti has far more then a %30 increase over a 1080. These are two completely different cards in terms of performance.

1080ti is the sweet spot.

This is a seasonal shift due to AMD's releases, market share changes as new models get released

Where could you get used 6950x for $100? I have been looking for 2y on eBay and the least expensive ones were at $175.

what's the outro song?

@techyescity my main rig currently has a Vega 56 that has the Samsung memory and supposedly can be flashed to Vega 64. Is it worth doing given the higher power consumption?

A few years ago I'd have been happy with a 1080, but now I'd probably try to get a 2080.

I still use gtx 1070 and do not see reason to buy anything better.

Hey Brian, have You ever tried to get an ARC A750 8GB used? The Intel Card doesn't look so bad in benchmarks.

mb

For me personally I go with nvidia on these older cards because emulators like Dolphin run better on nvidia than amd cards

AMD`s driver support is bad. NV is much longer, better and dedicated to the buyer. Imagine not being able to use your 1080 anymore, with decent drivers.

Nimez driver with Smart Access Memory would help Vega 64 a whole lot actually, there is no such option for GTX 1080...

False title it is NOT free, you have to pay extra for it.

5700xt my beloved

I recently switched from a first Gen GTX TITAN to a 1070 , and will keep it for a while ;p and probably buy a 5080 when the 60 series comes out

I think testing suite is not very well sorted. It's common knowledge that Vega used to run circles around GTX 1080s in Vulkan and DX12 titles.

Vega Linux testing using opensource mesa amdgpu drivers?

Hi, I got a question. I had a Vega64 back in the days & there was an option in the drivers to "extend" (or simulate) more VRAM like 16 GB if I remember correctly, out from the system. Has ever anybody come to use this option ? I did but besides the one game I had requesting more than 13 GB of vram for total ultra (Resident Evil 2) (also working on a Radeon VII mind you) I wonder if anyone used it....

power consumtion will bomb u back to the stone age

why the 12 g 3060 and not 8 g thats not apples to apples ???

Am just going to upgrade my Fractal case and one of these will suit me well. HS01 looks very suitable for my needs ... and aesthetically too.

Gittel naath : what is the meaning of word "play"? Investy maata : *** Gittel naath : who told ? Investy maata : sunny lone

Already bought that 3.5 sensor panel from Aliexpress a few month ago and very happy with it. Been looking for an EVGA 1080ti FTW3 ultra for my collection for more than a year but can't find 1 at a not crazy price, best I saw was dude in my country around 6 months ago for 300$ on facebook marketplace, importing it from ebay gonna cost even more so I'll keep looking. lol for 300$ I got two 780ti Kingpin.

People get mad at me for saying this, but stay away from the rx580, however, im not a fan of talking about cherry picked titles. The gtx 1080 is hands down the best option in the sub $100 price range, its not a fanboy thing... the card is just more readily available and has better support. The AND card that actually belongs here is the 5700(XT)

Hey Bryan, still rocking a GTX 1070Ti overclocked so numbers are pretty much even with stock GTX 1080 :D Nice video again :P

I have the same strix cooler on my card but it's a vega 56. Only thing I don't like is when AMD dropped the support on these two cards.

AMD's Second or Third from the Top end cards seem to have the best power consumption. RX-7900GRE is WAY more efficient than the RX-7900XTX RX-6800(Vanilla) is WAY more efficient than the RX-6900XT RX-5700(Vanilla) is WAY more efficient than the RX-5700XTX (rare based on Navi 10XTX) RX-Vega56 is WAY more efficient than the RX-Vega64

not one of the cards are good, as you was saying Driver support and power consume is a thing and even if the GTX 1080 get right now driver support, does not mean next year it will.

I'd like to order from Ali but we have to pay taxes if we order from China

3:46 vega solid 2192w power usage lmfao, a tiny osd bug.

Vega 64 was such a cool name. Wish that was the naming convention still.

I couldn't help thinking that Vega 64 is a Linux GPU now, it's just going to have better support there, undervolting etc. GTX1080 will have a bit more life in it. I still think these will run older games fine, probably a few cases where older architecture becomes an issue with textures. I still have a 1060 and a 1070 I picked up used last year around, still decent budget gpus. Originally the 1060 was from a Skylake era prebuilt, I really should have gone with the 1080 but first gpu/buyer's remorse. I remember streamer I followed had a 1080 at the time, just figured I didn't need that, but wish I had went for it in retrospect. Buy cheap, replace sooner sometimes. I think these would be fine in an esports/steam gaming rig or a Linux gaming rig for most games, great price performance.

I have your hair style too currently Bryan. Im Ryan. I chopped the front right off a lil and then got ahaircut and somehow ended up with newhaircut with the same right-side cut off that i did. How long does this last?